Aggressive Online Behavior Assignment
- What, if anything, can be done to curb aggressive behavior online? Assuming something can be done, which social institution(s) should play a role in regulating said behavior? The government? Educational institutions? The social media platforms themselves? The strongest papers will examine both the pros and cons associated with assigning responsibility to the social institution(s) addressed therein.
- Do online interactions bring out the worst in us, or does the Internet merely serve to amplify the actions and opinions of the most antisocial members of society? In other words, does the Internet cause cyber-aggression, or does it just allow for the large-scale transmission of existing aggressive behavior?
[place-order-2]
Note:
- Paper should be 2-3 pages
- Double spaced
- Times New Roman
Introduction
With advanced and sophisticated technologies, incidents of abusive online behavior that create power imbalance continue increasing. Online aggressive behavior includes impersonation, privacy invasion, harassment, and dating pressure and violence on people. Whether done online or offline, abusive behaviors are unacceptable (Suler, 2004). This assignment explains the measures that can be taken by social institutions to manage online aggressive behavior and regulate these disrespectful acts.
Establishing Alternative Communication Channels
Aggressive online users use weak language that directly harms a particular person’s reputation by the internet users. For example, students in educational systems regularly post abusive remarks while passing their grievances to the administration (Ybarra & Mitchelle, 2004). This behavior can be managed by the educational institutions establishing open forums whereby the students give their complaints directly to the administration and immediate feedback gets obtained without necessarily using the online media.
