Public Policy And Service Discussion1
The nation’s founders created a system of checks and balances among the institutions of government, primarily to ensure that the government could not tyrannize the population. That is, power would not be concentrated enough to pose such a threat. The structure of government they established over two hundred years ago remains much the same today. Fragmented power does not prevent policy action, as the routine administration of current national policies and programs and the development of new policies clearly indicate.
Despite policy successes, the fragmented U.S. political system generally makes it difficult for policymakers to respond to most public problems in a timely and coherent manner. Serious conflicts can develop between the federal government and the states and between branches of government.
In your original discussion post, please answer the following questions:
- Do you agree that the current political system of checks and balances is fragmenting the Americas? Why or why not? Please provide evidence (In-text citations from the readings to support your arguments.)
- Generally speaking, would you rather live in a government with strong states and a weak national government or vice versa? Why did you answer as you did? Please provide evidence (In-text citations from the readings to support your arguments.)
The approximate length of an original post should be between 200-300 words. Please use APA in-text citations of the articles read or websites to strengthen your opinion/ argument.